Aviation is an expensive industry. The FAA is responsible for regulating and promoting aviation, and this is an expensive task. The FAA is funded by tax payers, and this has been a recent source of controversy. Dana Hyde, associate director for general government programs, Office of Management and Budget, feels that an aviation user fee is the best way to make sure everyone pays their "fair share," according to a recent AVWeb article. Her proposal is to assess a $100 per flight fee for using the air traffic control system. The current proposal would exclude piston aircraft.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1f5e/f1f5ed8453063bb169f14199faefa939e6fa0fa5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95631/9563189fc2ae44bb6020f44f968cdd6393b83d8b" alt=""
There isn't a good prediction about what will happen in the future, especially 5 years out. There have been talks about adding aviation user fees in past years, but it seems to be materializing more. The impact user fees could have on aviation will depend on if they are ever added in the first place. If user fees become a reality, some fear that piston aircraft will not be excluded forever. This would greatly affect flight training, especially for those training for an instrument rating. Currently, there is no talk about that happening.
No comments:
Post a Comment